viernes, 6 de mayo de 2011

Wages of Sin

You should know about the madness of raise wages by a simple law, if possible, so this blog would not exist because we do not have enough time to spend the money from our salary. Unfortunately raise wages by law is not possible and the reasons behind the increase in wage levels are others that do not contradict the laws of economics or of logic.

To discuss what causes that in some countries the level of real wages is higher than in others, the example of Benegas Lynch is a good trigger:

When a painter of La Paz, Bolivia, moved to Vancouver, Canada, to continue their work seen their incomes increase astronomically, which is not due to the Canadian employer is more generous than the Bolivian but because the capital structure forces him to pay higher wages

But to finish a good understanding of the cause of high wages prefer the short text of W. M. Curtiss [1] that explains it very clearly:

In a free and competitive market, the price of a product or service depends on what someone is willing to pay for it. The same applies to the wages of labor. The employer must be willing to pay, if you want people who work for him. MUHC what you pay depends, in turn, how much their workers can produce.

Therefore, we find relatively high wages in a country where labor productivity is high. Where we find an extremely low level of wages, we can be confident that the productivity of workers is low. Here we talk about real wages, of course, that is what can be bought with the wages, not money wages. In a country experiencing high inflation, money wages can rise to astronomical heights, but used to buy very little, anyway.

The reason why there is a tremendous difference in the production of workers from different countries [...] can be briefly summarized in one word: Tools. The term includes tools and equipment factories, as well as the machinery that operates the worker. A man who has good tools to work, is more productive than having bad tools. The United States currently requires an average investment of 16,000 dollars [in 1952] to provide tools to a single industrial worker ...

To provide tools for workers should save a portion of the previous production. There is no other way. Workers compete for the use of tools, the more abundant is the supply of tools, the greater the likelihood that each worker is paid a high salary to use them. Workers who use their organized strength in order to thwart the production, thus avoiding saving for new tools - or whether new capital - tend to close their only path to true progress.

In conclusion we return to Benegas Lynch, who says:

No alchemy possible in economics. If capital structure is maintained by saving dose sufficient to pay off existing equipment, wages remain unchanged, if consumption or capital flight revenues dwindle, and if the cap rate increases, increase revenue. And for the latter is necessary to have civilized and stable institutional frameworks that guarantee property rights.

You know... We can print a infinite quantity of papers and call them "money", the one you like most (Dollar, Peso, Euro, Yen)... but that just doesn't solves the problem.

Parts of this text were based on


"Como dijo Say hace más de 200 años: para demandar primero hay que ofertar. Entonces, si queremos demanda (tanto local como internacional), tenemos que generar ofertas enormes de bienes y servicios lo más baratos posibles. Y cuando una gran parte de los costos son burocracias, ¿adiviná cuál es la parte que, por lógica, hay que cortar? Exacto, la que no le aporta absolutamente nada a los productos y servicios."

"As said by Say more than 200 years ago: For having demand, we must have first supply. Then, if we want demand (whether local or national) we have to generate bigger supplies (Of both goods and services) as cheaper as possible, And when a large portion of the costs are bureaucracies, guess which part should be logically cut? Exactly that which doesn't contribute anything to the products and services. "

(Based upon a post at argentine web

jueves, 28 de abril de 2011

Yes we can!

We are depending upong Obama decissions...

And he's taking the right ones!

We are next to reach you and knock at your door, if we're not doing it right now.

Support us, let's just make the 3 gestures economy another page in the Wikipedia or any encyclopedia... or even, just and old memento exposed to our grandsons at the British (or your local) Museum.

Let's open the door for 4G3W.

sábado, 1 de mayo de 2010

Wuwteam4G3W waiting your collaboration for Gool-Bama-Cash launch

Clara do Mar, FilipeAlvesFerreira and Mauro Francisco Caseres collaborators integrating our WUWteam4G3W working on the launch of the money datevaluation practice and derivative Economy 4G3W are open to receive you as agreed collaborator .


We would be more efective if you integrate our WUWteam4G3W working on the launch of the money datevaluation practice and derivative Economy 4G3W. - 1:40 pm, 29 Apr
2 unread of 2 - Clara, FilipeAlvesFerreira
The team for the universocial_linked_money is an open team where you may get for free your quality of Agreed Collaborator.

martes, 28 de abril de 2009

Proposing Gool-Bama-Cash solution

You are welcome at the WUW-team-4G3W

Our researches are focused on development of your personal economic performances in Economy 4G3W.
At WUW-team-4G3W were we have a reconized steak of 10% of all Author's copyrights.

Our team is open and all person may become Agreed Collaborator if accepted by all members.
We would be happy to heard about you by e-mail communication at

With the Agreement you receive the icon for free use in waves or other public communications.